This paper assesses whether NASA Black Marble nightlight intensity can serve as an early indicator of annual taxable income at the Italian municipal level, where official data are released with a 12–18 month lag. Using a panel of 7{,}631 municipalities over 2012–2021, we compare four recurrent neural network architectures (LSTM, BiLSTM, GRU, Transformer) against six benchmarks: simple persistence, panel fixed effects, autoregressive distributed lag, and two spatial econometric specifications (SAR, Spatial Durbin) on a queen-contiguity matrix. Models are trained on 2012–2019 and evaluated out-of-sample on 2020–2021 with a cross-sectional Diebold–Mariano test. A single-layer GRU achieves a median forecast error of 1.07 million euros across the cross-section of municipalities – approximately of the median municipal IRPEF income of 29 million euros – statistically dominating every benchmark (DM against persistence, against spatial linear models, all ). Spatial models recover statistically significant spatial autocorrelation () and a meaningful nightlight spillover (), but their forecasting gap with the GRU is virtually identical to that of spatially-naive linear specifications. We conclude that nightlights contain genuine predictive content for municipal income, but extracting it requires a model class flexible enough to capture cross-sectional heterogeneity and non-linearities that linear specifications, spatial or otherwise, cannot recover.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本