This paper presents a unified dataset and modeling framework for financial alternative dispute resolution (ADR) cases collected from multiple Japanese ADR organizations. Each case consists of paired claims from the complainant and the respondent with a binary settlement outcome. We introduce a functional tagging scheme to represent dispute structures and propose a multi-task model that jointly performs dispute classification and settlement prediction. Experimental results show that incorporating dispute structure improves prediction performance, and large language models achieve comparable or superior performance in several domains. These findings suggest that dispute structures are partially shared across ADR domains.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本