加载中…
Our position is that logic programming is not programming in the Horn clause sublogic of classical logic, but programming in a logic of (inductive) definitions. Thus, the similarity between prototypical Prolog programs (e.g., member, append, …) and how inductive definitions are expressed in mathematical text, is not coincidental but essential. We argue here that this provides a natural solution to the main lingering semantic questions of Logic Programming and its extensions.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本