Examining a hadronic $\gamma$-ray scenario for the radiative shell & molecular clouds of the old GeV supernova remnant G298.6$-$0.0

Based on the 13.7~yr Fermi-LAT data, Yeung et al. (2023) claimed detection of two $\gamma$-ray sources (Src-NE and Src-NW) associated with the supernova remnant (SNR) G298.6$-$0.0, and interpreted it as an old GeV SNR interacting with molecular clouds (MCs). In this follow-up study, we refine the flux measurements below 2~GeV with Fermi-LAT event types of better angular reconstruction. Then, we report our cosmic-ray phenomenology in a hadronic scenario, considering both the shell and MC regions of SNR G298.6$-$0.0. We confirm that both the $\gamma$-ray spectra of Src-NE and Src-NW exhibit spectral breaks at $1.50_{-0.50}^{+0.60}$~GeV and $0.68_{-0.11}^{+0.32}$~GeV, respectively. Src-NW has a harder broadband photon index than Src-NE, suggesting an appreciable difference between the physical separations of their respective emission sites from SNR G298.6$-$0.0. The cosmic-ray spectrum responsible for Src-NE starts with a minimum energy $E_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{R},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}=1.38_{-0.16}^{+0.47}$~GeV, and has a proton index ${\mathrm{\Gamma }}_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{R}}=2.57_{-0.21}^{+0.18}$ below the exponential cutoff energy $E_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{R},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}}=240_{-150}^{+240}$~GeV. Accordingly, we argue that Src-NE is dominated by the SNR shell, while only a minor portion of lower-energy emission is contributed by the MCs interacting with the SNR. The cosmic-ray population for Src-NW starts at a higher energy such that the $E_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{R},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}$ ratio of Src-NW to Src-NE is $\gtrsim$2. The high $E_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{R},\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}}$, as well as the high cosmic-ray energy density required ($\sim$26~eV~cm${}^{-3}$), supports the interpretation that Src-NW is predominantly the $\gamma$-ray emission from the farther MCs being bombarded by protons that had earlier escaped from SNR G298.6$-$0.0. By comparing the high-energy features of G298.6$-$0.0 with those of analogical SNRs, especially SNR W28 and SNR W44, we further constrain the age of SNR G298.6$-$0.0 to be 10–30~kyr.