We say that a ring is t-unital if the natural map is an isomorphism, and a left -module is c-unital if the natural map is an isomorphism. For a t-unital ring , the category of t-unital left -modules is a unital left module category over an associative, unital monoidal category of t-unital --bimodules, while the category of c-unital left -modules is opposite to a unital right module category over the same monoidal category. Any left s-unital ring , as defined by Tominaga in 1975, is t-unital; and a left -module is s-unital if and only if it is t-unital. For any (nonunital) ring , the full subcategory of s-unital -modules is a hereditary torsion class in the category of nonunital -modules; and for rings arising from small preadditive categories, the full subcategory of c-unital -modules is closed under kernels and cokernels. However, over a t-unital ring , the full subcategory of t-unital modules need not be closed under kernels, and the full subcategory of c-unital modules need not be closed under cokernels in the category of nonunital modules. Nevertheless, the categories of t-unital and c-unital left -modules are abelian and naturally equivalent to each other; they are also equivalent to the quotient category of the abelian category of nonunital modules by the Serre subcategory of modules with zero action of . This is a particular case of the result from a 1996 manuscript of Quillen. We also discuss related flatness, projectivity, and injectivity properties; and study the behavior of t-unitality and c-unitality under the restriction of scalars for a homomorphism of nonunital rings. Our motivation comes from the theory of semialgebras over coalgebras over fields.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本