Temporal Self-Rewarding Language Models: Decoupling Chosen-Rejected via Past-Future

Self-Rewarding Language Models propose an architecture in which the Large Language Models(LLMs) both generates responses and evaluates its own outputs via LLM-as-a-Judge prompting, dynamically improving its generative capabilities through iterative Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). However, our analysis reveals a critical limitation in existing Self-Rewarding paradigms: the synchronized improvement of chosen and rejected responses progressively narrows the representational difference between contrasting samples, undermining effective preference learning. We propose $\mathbf{\text{Temporal}}\mathbf{\text{Self-Rewarding}}\mathbf{\text{Language}}\mathbf{\text{Models}}$ that strategically coordinate past, present, and future model generations to sustain learning signals. Our dual-phase framework introduces: (1) $\mathit{\text{Anchored}}\mathit{\text{Rejection}}$ - fixing rejected responses using the past initial model’s outputs and (2) $\mathit{\text{Future-Guided}}\mathit{\text{Chosen}}$ - dynamically curating chosen samples using next-generation model predictions. Extensive experiments across three model families (Llama, Qwen, Mistral) and different model sizes (Llama3B/8B/70B) demonstrate significant improvements when trained with our method compared to Self-Rewarding using same computation resources. For example, Llama3.1-8B reaches a 29.44 win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 with our method, outperforming the Self-Rewarding baseline (19.69) by 9.75. Notably, our method also demonstrates superior out-of-distribution generalization across mathematical reasoning (GSM8K), knowledge-based QA (ARC, TruthfulQA), and code generation (HumanEval) tasks, even though we do not specifically collect such training data.