Standard battery management systems treat the control and state estimation problems as decoupled objectives, relying on certainty equivalence controllers that are blind to the varying observability induced by nonlinear open-circuit voltage models. In this paper, we show that for a broad class of objectives, including the peak shaving and valley filling scenarios common in grid-connected energy storage, the expected cost of a stochastic battery system can be exactly parametrized by the conditional mean and covariance of the state of charge. This reformulation reveals a direct coupling between the control input and estimation quality, a coupling that certainty equivalence controllers ignore, and motivates a dual-control approach in which the controller actively reduces estimation uncertainty by driving the state to high observability regions without compromising the control objective. We derive a deterministic surrogate to this stochastic cost and pose the dual-control problem as a computationally tractable model predictive control problem. We validate our approach on a nine-battery system tracking a time-varying power/demand reference trajectory. We report simultaneous improvements in control cost (up to 20% reduction) and state estimation error (up to 30% reduction). The estimation improvement is reported across different state estimators: extended Kalman filter, unscented Kalman filter, and a moving horizon estimator, confirming that the estimation improvement of our approach is not restricted to a specific state observer.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本