ELVAE places an input-dependent normal–inverse-gamma (NIG) hierarchy at each VAE latent coordinate, separating location uncertainty from conditional variability . The marginalized latent law, however, identifies only the three quotient coordinates with ; reconstruction is blind to one fiber direction. A companion theoretical analysis shows that the complete NIG prior and forward KL select a unique prior-relative canonical representative on each fiber, so canonical inverse allocation is not a fourth independent information channel. Empirically, trained inverse evidence remains the strongest sensitivity-ranking score. At , the three-seed mean high/low- semantic-transition ratios are 1.98 on MNIST and 1.66 on Fashion-MNIST, falling to 1.33 and 1.16 under scale-matched controls. In the 20-draw MNIST component study with equal per-anchor perturbation energy, gives high/low ratios 1.69 and 1.65 under the and fields and 1.69 (95% interval 1.45–1.97) under a geometry-free isotropic field, whereas reverses the isotropic ordering to 0.76. Under the experimental prior, canonical is a strictly increasing transform of and is bounded above by . Thus ELVAE exposes a controllable sensitivity mechanism whose trained four-output realization is operationally informative, while the exact reconstruction-visible information remains three-dimensional and baseline image quality is a separate question.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本