We propose that value – the quantity goal-directed agents create, destroy, and exchange – is a lawful structural quantity in the same category as information. Following Shannon’s method, we make one ruthless abstraction: value is the rate at which an agent converts a resource into goal-progress, relative to a frame fixed by its goal. A scale-invariance axiom forces a logarithmic measure, ; compounding of a reinvested resource forces the same form via the ergodicity argument of Peters (2019) – kin routes, a consistency check, not an over-determination. We derive a coding theorem of value, ; realized value decomposes as . For populations, value is frame-relative while price is frame-independent; a fleet that pools its resource and fuses its perception inherits the ceiling (a corollary; an earlier sum-form claim was wrong and is corrected in v5). A dynamical layer yields an is/ought asymmetry from which alignment emerges as a control-stability condition. We test the single-frame laws on live language models, pre-registered: perception mutual information tracks realized capability (Spearman over 30 modeldomain points); out-of-sample tracks , shape-invariant across four task shapes (, slope ); over-confidence is measurable dissipation. The stated continuation gate has since been run (pre-registered, frontier-model population): the coupled capacity-region prediction – growth-gap law, coalition submodularity with an XOR synergy control, joint ceiling, Kelly selection – is confirmed within its frozen bands on real agents; the mean-field residual law found no domain (populations hold no goal dispersion) and is retired to its mathematical scope. The contribution is the unification and the governance mapping that follows.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本