Given a finite family of graphs, we say that a graph is “-free” if does not contain any graph in as a subgraph. A vertex-colored graph is called “rainbow” if no two vertices of have the same color. Given an integer and a finite family of graphs , let denote the smallest integer such that any properly vertex-colored -free graph having contains an induced rainbow path on vertices. Scott and Seymour showed that exists for every complete graph . A conjecture of N. R. Aravind states that . The upper bound on that can be obtained using the methods of Scott and Seymour setting are, however, super-exponential. Gy'arf'as and S'ark"ozy showed that . For , we show that and therefore, . This significantly improves Gy'arf'as and S'ark"ozy’s bound and also covers a bigger class of graphs. We adapt our proof to achieve much stronger upper bounds for graphs of higher girth: we prove that $\ell(s,{C_3,C_4,\ldots,C_{g-1}})\leq s^{1+\frac{4}{g-4}}g\geq 5$. Moreover, in each case, our results imply the existence of at least distinct induced rainbow paths on vertices. Along the way, we obtain some results on related problems on oriented graphs. For , let denote the orientations of in which one vertex has out-degree or in-degree . We show that every -free oriented graph having $\chi(G)\geq (r-1)(s-1)(s-2)+2s+1Gg\geq 5\chi(G)\geq 2s^{1+\frac{4}{g-4}}s$ vertex oriented tree as an induced subgraph.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本