加载中…
Li et al. (Science Advances, 29 January, p. eabe3068) claim the discovery of two improper ferroelectrics, dabcoHClO4 and dabcoHBF4 (dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane), and that these materials exhibit superior pyroelectric figures of merit. This information is misleading due to the fundamental methodological errors and false conclusions, not to mention that these ferroelectrics were reported over 20 years ago. They are proper ferroelectrics, for which the spontaneous polarization is the macroscopic order parameter. We show that the useful pyroelectric coefficients of these materials are about 103 times lower than these reported by Li et al.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本