Let be a graph with vertex set , and let be a positive integer. A set is a \emph{distance- dominating set} of if, for each vertex , there exists a vertex such that , where is the minimum number of edges linking and in . Let . A set is a \emph{distance- resolving set} of if, for any pair of distinct , there exists a vertex such that . The \emph{distance- domination number} (\emph{distance- dimension} , respectively) of is the minimum cardinality of all distance- dominating sets (distance- resolving sets, respectively) of . The \emph{distance- location-domination number}, , of is the minimum cardinality of all sets such that is both a distance- dominating set and a distance- resolving set of . Note that is the well-known location-domination number introduced by Slater in 1988. For any connected graph of order , we obtain the following sharp bounds: (1) ; (2) ; (3) $1\le \max{\gamma_k(G), \dim_k(G)} \le \gamma_L^k(G) \le \min{\dim_k(G)+1, n-1}G\gamma_L^k(G)\in{1, |V|-1}$. We observe that can be arbitrarily large. Moreover, for any tree of order , we show that $\gamma_L^k(T)\le n-ex(T)ex(T)T$, and we characterize trees achieving equality. We also examine the effect of edge deletion on the distance- location-domination number of graphs.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本