An example in the article shows that the first derivative of sharing CM and IM with its shift $\pi i$ cannot obtain they are equal. In this paper, we study the uniqueness of meromorphic function sharing small functions with their shifts concerning its derivatives. We improves the author’s result \cite{h} from entire function to meromorphic function, the first derivative to its differential-difference polynomial, and also finite values to small functions. As for , we obtain: Let be a transcendental meromorphic function of , let be a nonzero finite value, and let be two distinct small functions of such that is a periodic function with period and is any small function of . If and share CM, and share IM, then either $f(z)\equiv f(z+c)$e^{p(z)}\equiv \frac{f(z+c)-a_{1}(z+c)}{f(z)-a_{1}(z)}\equiv \frac{a_{2}(z+c)-a_{1}(z+c)}{a_{2}(z)-a_{1}(z)},$p(z)$ is a non-constant entire function of such that $e^{p(z+c)}\equiv e^{p(z)}$.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本