Comment on "Erratum: Negative-parity high-spin states and a possible magnetic rotation band in ${}_{59}^{135}$Pr${}_{76}$ [Phys. Rev. C 92, 054325 (2015)]"

In [Ritika Garg et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 069901(E) (2019)] the experimental results on the polarization asysmetry were revised due to a claimed change of the geometry asymmetry. However, the revised results can not be reproduced as claimed in the erratum by simply changing the geometry asymmetry in extracting the polarization asymmetry, without re-extracting the polarization asymmetry from the original experimental data. It is possible that the quoted errors were significantly underestimated.