Let and ${\Sigma_1}({\sf T},{\sf T}‘)\Sigma_1{\sf T}{\sf T}’$. In this paper we characterize the following relative provability logics: , ${\Sigma_1}({\sf HA},{\sf PA}){\Sigma_1}({\sf HA}^*,){\Sigma_1}({\sf HA}^,{\sf PA})({\sf PA},{\sf HA})_{\Sigma_1}({\sf PA},{\sf HA})({\sf PA}^,{\sf HA}){\Sigma_1}({\sf PA}^,{\sf HA})({\sf PA}^,{\sf PA}){\Sigma_1}({\sf PA}^,{\sf PA})({\sf PA}^,){\Sigma_1}({\sf PA}^*,)$ (see Table \ref{Table-Theories}). It turns out that all of these provability logics are decidable. The notion of {\em reduction} for provability logics, first informally considered in \cite{reduction}. In this paper, we formalize a generalization of this notion (\Cref{Definition-Reduction-PL}) and provide several reductions of provability logics (See diagram \ref{Diagram-full}). The interesting fact is that is the hardest provability logic: the arithmetical completenesses of all provability logics listed above, as well as well-known provability logics like $({\sf PA},{\sf PA})({\sf PA},){\Sigma_1}({\sf PA},{\sf PA}){\Sigma_1}({\sf PA},){\Sigma_1}({\sf HA},{\sf HA})$ are all propositionally reducible to the arithmetical completeness of $_{\Sigma_1}({\sf HA},)$.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本