Details of the explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are
not yet fully understood. There is an increasing number of numerical examples
by ab-initio core-collapse simulations leading to an explosion. Most, if not
all, of the ab-initio core-collapse simulations represent a slow' explosion in which the observed explosion energy ($\sim 10^{51}$ ergs) is reached in a timescale of $\gtrsim1$ second. It is, however, unclear whether such a slow explosion is consistent with observations. In this work, by performing nuclear reaction network calculations for a range of the explosion timescale $t_{\rm grow}$, from the rapid to slow models, we aim at providing nucleosynthetic diagnostics on the explosion timescale. We employ one-dimensional hydrodynamic and nucleosynthesis simulations above the proto-neutron star core, by parameterizing the nature of the explosion mechanism by $t_{\rm grow}$. The results are then compared to various observational constraints; the masses of $^{56}$Ni derived for typical CCSNe, the masses of $^{57}$Ni and $^{44}$Ti observed for SN 1987A, and the abundance patterns observed in extremely metal-poor stars. We find that these observational constraints are consistent with the rapid’ explosion ( ms), and especially the
best match is found for a nearly instantaneous explosion ($t_{\rm grow}
\lesssim 50$ ms). Our finding places a strong constraint on the explosion
mechanism; the slow mechanism ( ms) would not
satisfy these constraints, and the ab-inito simulations will need to realize a
rapid explosion.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本