Generalized finite automata (GFAs), probabilistic finite automata (PFAs), and one-way general quantum finite automata (1gQFA) recognize the same strict-cutpoint languages, but the state complexity of exact probabilistic simulation has remained unclear. This paper determines that worst-case cost exactly: every -state 1gQFA admits exact strict-cutpoint simulation by a one-way PFA with states, via the standard -dimensional mixed-state linearization together with an explicit alphabet-preserving construction that converts each -state GFA into a one-way PFA with at most states; conversely, for every , there exists an -state 1gQFA for which every equivalent one-way PFA requires at least states, obtained from a prepare–test construction and a Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension argument. Hence the worst-case probabilistic state cost of exact strict-cutpoint simulation is .

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本