加载中…
Abhyankar showed that for a finite tame extension and a finite extension of -adic fields, the condition $[\nu L_1 : \nu K][\nu L_2 : \nu K]$ is sufficient to eliminate ramification, that is, is unramified. In this paper, we show that the above condition is not sufficient in the case of an arbitrary henselian valued field. We construct a counterexample illustrating that fact. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for the elimination of tame ramification of a henselian field after a finite extension of the base field.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本