We use observational data from Supernovae (SNIa) Pantheon sample, from direct Hubble constant measurements with cosmic chronometers (CC), from the Cosmic Microwave Background shift parameter , and from redshift space distortion () measurements, in order to constrain gravity. We do not follow the common parameterization within the semi-analytical approximation of the growth rate, in order to avoid model-dependent uncertainties. Up to our knowledge this is the first time that gravity is analyzed within a Bayesian framework, and with background and perturbation behaviour considered jointly. We show that all three examined models are able to describe adequately the data. Furthermore, applying the Akaike, Bayesian and Deviance Information Criteria, we conclude that all considered models are statistically equivalent, however the most efficient candidate is the exponential model, which additionally presents a small deviation from CDM paradigm.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本