We discover that large language models exhibit \emph{spectral phase transitions} in their hidden activation spaces when engaging in reasoning versus factual recall. Through systematic spectral analysis across spanning (Qwen, Pythia, Phi, Llama, DeepSeek-R1), we identify core phenomena: (1)~ – 9/11 models show significantly lower for reasoning (), with larger effects in stronger models; (2)~ – base models show reasoning factual , while instruction-tuned models reverse this relationship; (3)~ – prompt-to-response shifts partition into expansion, compression, and equilibrium regimes; (4)~ – across 4 Qwen base models (); (5)~ – per-token alpha tracking reveals local synchronization that decays exponentially with layer distance, and is weaker for reasoning than factual tasks; (6)~ – phase-transition signatures align with reasoning step boundaries; and (7)~ – spectral alone achieves AUC (Qwen2.5-7B, late layers) and mean AUC across 6 models in predicting correctness \emph{before} the final answer is generated. Together, these findings establish a comprehensive \emph{spectral theory of reasoning} in transformers, revealing that the geometry of thought is universal in direction, architecture-specific in dynamics, and predictive of outcome.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本