Modular specification of monads through higher-order presentations

In their work on second-order equational logic, Fiore and Hur have studied presentations of simply typed languages by generating binding constructions and equations among them. To each pair consisting of a binding signature and a set of equations, they associate a category of models', and they give a monadicity result which implies that this category has an initial object, which is the language presented by the pair. In the present work, we propose, for the untyped setting, a variant of their approach where monads and modules over them are the central notions. More precisely, we study, for monads over sets, presentations by generating (higher-order’) operations and equations among them. We consider a notion of 2-signature which allows to specify a monad with a family of binding operations subject to a family of equations, as is the case for the paradigmatic example of the lambda calculus, specified by its two standard constructions (application and abstraction) subject to $\beta$- and $\eta$-equalities. Such a 2-signature is hence a pair $(\mathrm{\Sigma },E)$ of a binding signature $\mathrm{\Sigma }$ and a family $E$ of equations for $\mathrm{\Sigma }$. This notion of 2-signature has been introduced earlier by Ahrens in a slightly different context. We associate, to each 2-signature $(\mathrm{\Sigma },E)$, a category of models of $(\Sigma,E)$; and we say that a 2-signature is effective’ if this category has an initial object; the monad underlying this (essentially unique) object is the monad specified by the 2-signature'. Not every 2-signature is effective; we identify a class of 2-signatures, which we call algebraic’, that are effective. Importantly, our 2-signatures together with their models enjoy `modularity’: when we glue (algebraic) 2-signatures together, their initial models are glued accordingly. We provide a computer formalization for our main results.