In this short note we show two completely opposite methods of constructing entangled states. Given a bipartite state , define , , where $F\in M_k\otimes M_k$ is the flip operator. In the first method, entanglement is a consequence of the inequality . In the second method, there is no correlation between and . These two methods show how diverse is quantum entanglement. We prove that any bipartite state satisfies $\displaystyle SN(\gamma)\geq\max \left{ \frac{(\gamma_L)}{(\gamma)}, \frac{(\gamma_R)}{(\gamma)}, \frac{SN(\gamma_S)}{2}, \frac{SN(\gamma_A)}{2} \right},SN(\gamma)$ stands for the Schmidt number of and are the marginal states of . We also present a family of PPT states in , whose members have Schmidt number equal to , for any given $1\leq n\leq \left\lceil\frac{k-1}{2}\right\rceil$. This is a new contribution to the open problem of finding the best possible Schmidt number for PPT states.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本