加载中…
The original proof has a gap, and need extra hypothesis that the strong stable and strong unstable filiation both to be . The argument is like the following: with the regularity, one can show that the weak-stable and weak-unstable foliation both to be , and then following the same argument as in the paper one can conclude the proof. But this extra hypothesis seems implying that the flow has a contact structure. Then it will be only a result which improves the Foulon’s proof on contract structure for regularity to , not so interest.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本