A subfamily of sets is a copy of a poset in if there exists a bijection $\phi:P\rightarrow {F_1,F_2,\dots,F_{|P|}}x \le_P x’\phi(x)\subseteq \phi(x’){\cal F}c(P,{\cal F})P{\cal F}{\cal F}Pc(P,{\cal F})=0P,Q$ let us denote by the maximum number of copies of over all -free families , i.e. $\max{c(Q,{\cal F}): {\cal F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}, c(P,{\cal F})=0 }$. This generalizes the well-studied parameter where is the one element poset. The quantity has been determined (precisely or asymptotically) for many posets , and in all known cases an asymptotically best construction can be obtained by taking as many middle levels as possible without creating a copy of . In this paper we consider the first instances of the problem of determining . We find its value when and are small posets, like chains, forks, the poset and diamonds. Already these special cases show that the extremal families are completely different from those in the original -free cases: sometimes not middle or consecutive levels maximize and sometimes no asymptotically extremal family is the union of levels. Finally, we determine the maximum number of copies of complete multi-level posets in -Sperner families. The main tools for this are the profile polytope method and two extremal set system problems that are of independent interest: we maximize the number of -tuples $A_1,A_2,\dots, A_r \in {\cal A}{\cal A}\subseteq 2^{[n]}\cap_{i=1}^rA_i=\emptyset\cap_{i=1}^rA_i=\emptyset\cup_{i=1}^rA_i=[n]$.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本