Selecting the top from items via expensive -wise comparisons is central to settings ranging from LLM-based document reranking to crowdsourced evaluation and tournament design. Existing methods either rely on heuristics that discard comparison information, or exploit it at prohibitive cost. We introduce a tournament graph framework that provides a principled foundation for -wise ranking. Our key observation is that each -item comparison reveals an induced tournament of pairwise preferences; aggregating these into a global preference graph and computing its transitive closure yields many additional orderings without further oracle calls. We formalize when the current top- output is certifiably determined and design a greedy query schedule that maximizes information gain towards identifying the top- items. The framework also gracefully handles non-transitive preferences – cycles induced by real-world oracles – by collapsing them into equivalence classes that yield principled tiered rankings. Applied to LLM reranking across 14 benchmarks and 5 models, BlitzRank achieves Pareto dominance over existing approaches: matching or exceeding accuracy while requiring 25–40% fewer tokens than comparable methods; against pairwise reranking, it achieves near-identical quality with 7 fewer tokens. Code available at https://github.com/ContextualAI/BlitzRank.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本