In this work we proof the following theorem which is, in addition to
someother lemmas, our main result:\noindent . Let$\ X={ (
x_{1}%t_{1}) ( x_{2}t_{2}) \text{, …,
}(x_{n}t_{n})} \times
^{\ast +}R%^{\ast
+}\varepsilon > 0r\in R0 <
\varepsilon \leq r( \dfrac{p_{i}}{q})
_{i=1,2,…,n}$ such that:{c}| x_{i}-\dfrac{p_{i}}{q}| \leq \varepsilon
t_{i} \varepsilon q\leq t_{i}|i=1,2,…,n \tag{}\noindent
It is clear that the condition for is
equivalent to \varepsilon q\leq t=\underset{i=1,2,...,n}{Min%} .
Also, we have () for all verifying $0 < \varepsilon \leq
\varepsilon _{0}=\min R$.The previous theorem is the classical equivalent of
the following one whichis formulated in the context of the nonstandard analysis
(%, , , ).\noindent For every
positive infinitesimal real , there exists an unlimited integer
depending only of , such that $\forall ^{st}x \in
\exists p_{x} \in $ $:{ {ccc}x & = & \dfrac{p_{x}}{q}+\varepsilon
\phi \varepsilon q & \cong & 0.$ For this reason, to prove the nonstandard
version of the main result and to get its classical version we place ourselves
in the context of the nonstandard analysis.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本