Let be a convex body, and for a positive integer , let be a configuration of points in . The discrepancy of with respect to is defined by \begin{equation*} (,, C)=\sum_{\in}\sum_{\in^2}C(+)-N|C|, \end{equation*} and one may estimate how deviates from uniformity by averaging the latter quantity over a family of sets. When considering quadratic averages over translated and dilated copies of , one gets the \begin{equation*} 2(,, C)=\int{0}^{1}\int{[0,1)^2}\left|( ,,\boldsymbolτ+δC)\right|^2,{\rm d}\boldsymbolτ,{\rm d} δ. \end{equation*} We investigate the behaviour of the optimal , that is \begin{equation*} \inf_{# =N} _2(,, C)\quad\quad N\to+\infty. \end{equation*} Beck~\cite{MR915529} and Beck and Chen~\cite{MR1489133} showed that the optimal of convex polygons has an order of growth of , and more recently, Brandolini and Travaglini~\cite{MR4358540} proved that the optimal of planar convex bodies with a boundary has an order of growth of . We show that, in general, a single order of growth for the optimal need not exist. First, by an implicit geometric construction of , we obtain prescribed oscillations between and . Second, by a subtler design of and via Fourier-analytic methods, we obtain prescribed polynomial-order oscillations in the range with .

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本