An {\em arrangement} of an ordered pair of graphs is defined as a function from to such that, for each vertex of , the vertex-set of either is (the case when ) or induces a connected subgraph of and that the family is a partition of . Let be an arrangement of , let be an edge of and let be a subset of such that each of the three graphs , and is ether connected or and that $\big(f^{-1}(p)\cup f^{-1}(q) \big) \setminus U \neq \emptysetUpq$ is defined as the modification of such that for every $ x \notin Uf^{\prime}(u):=qu \in Ufg(G_A, G_M)$ are called {\em t-equivalent} if they can be transformed into each other by a finite sequence of transfers. An ordered pair of graphs is called {\em almighty} if every two arrangements of the pair $(G_A, G_M)$ are t-equivalent. In this study, we consider the following two decision problems. [{\bf (P1)}]{For a given pair of arrangements and of a given ordered pair of graphs, decide whether is t-equivalent to or not.} [{\bf (P2)}]{For a given ordered pair of graphs, decide whether the pair is almighty or not.} We show an -time algorithm for {\bf (P1)}, and prove the -completeness of {\bf (P2)}.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本