加载中…
The claim in \cite{Al-Badawi:2025ipr} that “the errors in the foundational components (3) and (5) of Ref. [1] invalidate all subsequent analyses, numerical results, and physical interpretations that depend on them” is entirely unfounded. This statement reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the typographical nature of the error and appears to be a misplaced critique originating from a competing author, rather than a substantive assessment of the results, which remain fully valid.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本