We present a detailed study of and $B\to K_1(1400) \gammaB\to K_{1A} (1^3P_1)B\to K_{1B} (1^1P_1)T_1^{K_{1A}}(0)T_1^{K_{1B}}(0)$, where the contributions are included up to the first order in . We resolve the sign ambiguity of the – mixing angle by defining the signs of decay constants, and . From the comparison of the theoretical calculation and the data for decays and , we find that is favored. In contrast to , the hard-spectator contribution suppresses the and branching ratios slightly. The predicted branching ratios are in agreement with the Belle measurement within the errors. We point out that a more precise measurement for the ratio $R_{K_1}={\cal B}(B\to K_1(1400)\gamma)/{\cal B}(B\to K_1(1270)\gamma)\theta_{K_1}$ and consequently the theoretical uncertainties can be reduced.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本