Motivated by searches for weak coherent drives, we formulate repeated quantum sensing with a fixed shot budget as an asymmetric composite hypothesis test. Taking Rabi sensing as a concrete example, we benchmark detection power, sensitivity, and Type-II error exponents in the resonant case with unknown signal amplitude and phase. We compare non-adaptive population and transverse readouts with a myopic Bayesian policy that selects each projective axis by maximizing the expected information gain in one step. The common decision statistic is a log Bayes factor, with a policy specific threshold calibrated under the null to enforce a common Type-I error. A weak signal expansion shows that population readout is phase independent but quadratic in amplitude, giving sensitivity, whereas transverse readout is linear in amplitude and permits sensitivity without adaptation, but is phase-dependent. In Monte Carlo pseudoexperiments, the adaptive policy exploits posterior information about the unknown direction to guide subsequent readouts; its sensitivity is consistent with over the simulated large range and, at the largest simulated shot counts, outperforms the fixed transverse schedules. Its phase-averaged effective Type-II exponent also exceeds the non-adaptive references over the simulated range. These results demonstrate the finite budget value of exploiting nuisance parameter information under calibrated false positive control.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本