We investigate decidability of properties in the lattice of extensions of the Grzegorczyk tense logic and the lattice of reflexive and transitive tense logics, with applications to the lattice of bi-superintuitionistic logics. We prove that a broad class of properties is undecidable in , including tabularity, Kripke completeness, the finite model property, and decidability, which also yields their undecidability in . We also construct infinitely many tabular extensions of (and thus of ) whose coincidence problems are undecidable, while presenting one tabular extension of and infinitely many ones of with a decidable coincidence problem. As a consequence, we obtain that the finite model property and tabularity are undecidable in , and that there are infinitely many tabular extensions of whose coincidence problems are undecidable. These results clarify some similarities and differences between and , and , as well as and . The proofs adapt Chagrov’s method of reducing from an undecidable problem for Minsky machines. We isolate and explicitly formulate the method of good valuations, a recurring technique underlying several proofs in the literature that use large frames, making it available for further applications.

生成讲解博客的中文版本

生成AI智能校验的中文版本