PromptResponse: Optimizing Prompts for LLM Coding Tasks

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in research workflows and software development pipelines, yet their output remains sensitive to input prompt variations. This paper presents $\text{unicode}x00AB$PromptResponse$\text{unicode}x00BB$, a controlled study examining how formatting and LLM-based tuning of coding task prompts affect the resulting code’s performance, efficiency, and stability. Using five semantically identical yet syntactically distinct variants of the HumanEval dataset$\text{unicode}x2014$baseline, JSON, Markdown, YAML, and an LLM-tuned version$\text{unicode}x2014$we had GPT-4o solve its coding problems over 8200$\text{unicode}x00A0$executions. Our results show that consistent formatting$\text{unicode}x2014$especially JSON$\text{unicode}x2014$improves generation efficiency and syntactic stability, with minor gains in task performance. Conversely, the LLM-tuned prompts resulted in significantly degraded task performance without significant improvements in any other dimension. These findings suggest that low-effort reformatting alone can yield measurable improvements, while tuning must account for model alignment. We conclude our work with providing a set of practical recommendations informed by our results as well as releasing our dataset variants and evaluation pipeline for future work.